Zero Loss
The Indian Experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37773/ees.v9i1.1878Keywords:
Hartwick’s Rule, Zero Loss, Resource Rent, Sustainable Development, Public Trust Doctrine, Intergenerational EquityAbstract
The Supreme Court has interpreted the principles of equality and common good to include the "Zero Loss" principle when alienating public assets. It is required to achieve intergenerational equity and weak sustainability. Historically, the first-come, first-served method was used for mining lease allocations. However, low and uniform royalty rates failed to capture the full resource rent, leading to significant losses of public wealth, violating the principle. Competitive auctions for mining leases were made mandatory in order to achieve zero loss as well as ensure fairness in the allocation process. Case studies from Goa, Odisha, and Telangana demonstrate that implementation of the principle has substantially increased mineral sale proceeds for state governments as owner trustees. However, since winning bidders have often promised to pay more than the mine gate price, there is a need for robust monitoring to ensure zero loss is sustained throughout the mining phase of these leases.
Downloads
References
Asher, Sam, and Paul Novosad. 2023. “Rent Seeking and Criminal Politicians: Evidence from Mining Booms.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 105 (1): 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01064
CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General of India). 2012. Performance Audit of Allocation of Coal Blocks and Augmentation of Coal Production. Report 7 of 2012–13. https://cag.gov.in/en/audit-report/details/1837
GoK (Government of Karnataka). 2008. Report of the Reference Made by the Government of Karnataka under Section 7(2-A) of The Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984, Part I. Karnataka Lokayukta. https://web.archive.org/web/20121117081902/http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Karnataka-Lokayukta-into-allegations-of-Illegal-Mining1.pdf.
———. 2011. Report of the Reference Made by the Government of Karnataka under Section 7(2-A) of The Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984, Part II. Karnataka Lokayukta. https://web.archive.org/web/20181223040842/http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Karnataka-Lokayukta-Report-on-Illegal-Mining.pdf.
Hartwick, John M. 1977. “Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources.” American Economic Review 67 (5): 972–974. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1828079
MoM (Ministry of Mines). (n.d.). “Shah Commission of Inquiry.” https://mines.gov.in/webportal/shahcommissioninquiry
Pearce, David W, and Giles D Atkinson. 1993. “Capital Theory and the Measurement of Sustainable Development: An Indicator of ‘Weak’ Sustainability.” Ecological Economics 8 (2): 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9
The Hindu. 2023. “BRS Tells Rahul Gandhi That Telangana Sand Policy Was the Best in the Country.” The Hindu, October 21, 2023. https://www.thehindu.com/elections/telangana-assembly/brs-tells-rahul-gandhi-that-telangana-sand-policy-was-the-best-in-the-country/article67443882.ece
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rahul Basu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The author(s) retain copyright on work published by INSEE unless specified otherwise.
Licensing and publishing rights
Author(s) of work published by INSEE are required to transfer non-exclusive publishing right to INSEE of the definitive work in any format, language and medium, for any lawful purpose.
Authors who publish in Ecology, Economy and Society will release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. This license allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given.
For details of the rights that the authors grant users of their work, see the "human-readable summary" of the license, with a link to the full license. (Note that "you" refers to a user, not an author, in the summary.)
The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the published article(s), provided attribution is given to the Ecology, Economy and Society—the INSEE Journal with details of the original publication, as set out in the official citation of the article published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the article on the authors’ or their institution’s websites or in institutional repositories.
In case of re-publishing a previously published work, author may note that earlier publication may have taken place a license different from Creative Commons. In all such cases of re-publishing, we advise the authors to consult the applicable licence at article level.
Ecology, Ecoomy and Society--the INSEE Journal is a society run diamond Open Access and Scopus indexed journal.