Socio-spatial Infrastructures
Drinking Water Supply and Formation of Unequal Socio-technological Relations in Rural Southern Bihar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37773/ees.v6i2.990Keywords:
Drinking Water Supply, Infrastructure Assemblage; Geography and Technology, Political Ecology, Southern Bihar.Abstract
This paper explores the social and spatial implications of drinking water infrastructures in rural southern Bihar. Hardiya, a multi-caste and multi-religion village, has a complex social arrangement. This village consists of original households, households resettled due to dam construction, and households resettled due to excessive fluoride contamination in groundwater. Excessive fluoride produces incidences of fluorosis among households, and historically, households have low access to clean drinking water. In response to the drinking water and public health crisis, multiple state, non-state, and transnational institutions intervened in Hardiya to provide safe technologies and infrastructures for clean drinking water. These twenty years of interventions have brought different technologies, institutions, and actors together to supply drinking water. However, these schemes are functioning inadequately on the ground, and access to clean water remains a big question amidst the development of drinking water infrastructures in Hardiya. This paper explores the dialectical relationship between drinking water infrastructures and social spaces, how both shape each other, through which assemblages, and what it renders. It explores the uneven outcomes of this technological intervention across different socio-spatial groups in Hardiya...
Downloads
Metrics
References
Anand, Nikhil. 2011. “Pressure: The Politechnics of Water Supply in Mumbai.” Cultural Anthropology 26 (4): 542–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2011.01111.x.
———. 2017. Hydraulic City: Water and the Infrastructures of Citizenship in Mumbai. Durham: Duke University Press.
Appel, Hannah, Nikhil Anand, and Akhil Gupta. 2018. “Introduction: Temporality, Politics and the Promise of Infrastructure.” In The Promise of Infrastructure edited by Nikhil Anand, Akhil Gupta, and Hannah Appel, 1–38. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101q3.4
Bakker, Karen. 2012. “Water: Political, Biopolitical, Material.” Social Studies of Science 42 (4): 616–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712441396.
———. 2007. “The “Commons” vs. The “Commodity”: Alter-globalization, Anti-privatization and the Human Right to Water in the Global South.” Antipode 39 (3): 430–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00534.x.
Banister, Jeffrey M. 2014. “Are You Wittfogel or Against Him? Geophilosophy, Hydro-Sociality, and the State.” Geoforum 57: 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.03.004 .
Bijker, Wiebe. 2012. “Do We Live in Water Cultures? A Methodological Commentary.” Social Studies of Science 42 (4): 624–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712441690
Björkman, Lisa. 2015. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822375210
Boelens, Rutgerd, Jaime Hoogesteger, Erik Swyngedouw, Jeroen Vos, and Phillipus Wester. 2016. “Hydrosocial Territories: A Political Ecology Perspective.” Water International 41 (1): 1–14. http://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1134898.
Budds, Jessica. 2009. “Contested H2O: Science, Policy and Politics in Water Resources Management in Chile.” Geoforum 40 (3): 418–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.008.
Breshinan, Patrick, and Arielle Hesse. 2020. “Political Ecologies of Infrastructural and Intestinal Decay.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 4 (3): 778–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848620902382.
Census of India. 1981. District Census Handbook: Nawada District. Bihar: Directorate of Census Operations.
Census of India. 1991. District Census Handbook: Nawada District. Bihar: Directorate of Census Operations.
Census of India. 2001. District Census Handbook: Nawada District. Bihar: Directorate of Census Operations.
Census of India. 2011. District Census Handbook: Nawada District. Bihar: Directorate of Census Operations.
Census of India. 2012. Bihar Table on Household, Amenities, and Assets. Bihar: Director of Census Operations.
Central Ground Water Board. 2013. Ground Water Information Booklet, Nawada District, Bihar State. Patna: Ministry of Water Resources.
Dixon, Deborah P, and Mark Whitehead. 2008. “Technological Trajectories: Old and New Dialogues in Geography and Technology Studies.” Social and Cultural Geography 9 (6): 601–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360802320560.
Ernstson, Henrik, and David Nilsson. 2022. “Towards Situated Histories of Heterogeneous Infrastructures: Oral History as Method and Meaning.” Geoforum 134: 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.06.001.
Ferguson, James. 1994. The Anti-Politics Machine: Development, De-Politicization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
———. 2012. “Structures of Responsibility.” Ethnography 13 (4): 558–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138111435755
Ferguson, James, and Akhil Gupta. 2002. “Spatializing States: Toward an Ethnography of Neoliberal Governmentality.” American Ethnologist 29 (4): 981–1002. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3805165.
Furlong, Kathryn. 2014. “STS Beyond The “Modern Infrastructure Ideal”: Extending Theory by Engaging with Infrastructure Challenges in the South.” Technology in Society 38: 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.04.001.
Gandy, Matthew. 2004. “Rethinking Urban Metabolism: Water, Space and the Modern City”. City 8 (3): 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360481042000313509.
Goodwin, Geoff. 2018. “Water, Infrastructure and Power: Contention and Resistance in Post-colonial Cities of the South.” Development and Change 49 (6): 1616–1630. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12458.
Graham, Steve, and Simon Marvin. 2002. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203452202
Gupta, Akhil. 2001. “Governing Population: The Integrated Child Development Services Program in India.” In States of Imagination: Ethnographic Explorations of the Postcolonial State, edited by Thomas Blom Hansen and Finn Stepputat, 65–96. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11smxxj.6
———. 2001. “Blurred Boundaries: The Discourse of Corruption, the Culture of Politics, and the Imagined State.” American Ethnologist 22 (2): 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1995.22.2.02a00090
———. 2018. “The Future in Ruins: Thoughts on the Temporality of Infrastructure.” In The Promise of Infrastructure, edited by Nikhil Anand, Akhil Gupta, and Hannah Appel. Durham: Duke University Press.
Kacker, Suneetha Dasappa, and Anuradha Joshi. 2012. “Pipe Dreams? The Governance of Urban Water Supply in Informal Settlements, New Delhi.” IDS Bulletin 43 (2): 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00304.x
Krause, F, and Veronica Strang. 2016. “Thinking Relationships Through Water.” Society & Natural Resources 29 (6): 633–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2016.1151714.
Krause, Franz. 2021. “Water and Materiality.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Anthropology. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.473.
Larkin, Brain. 2013. “The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure.” Annual Review of Anthropology 42: 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522.
Lawhon, Mary, David Nilsson, Jonathan Silver, Henrick Ernstson, and Shuaib Lwasa. 2018. “Thinking Through Heterogeneous Infrastructure Configurations.” Urban Studies 55 (4): 720–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017720149.
Ley, Lukas, and Franz Krause. 2019. “Ethnographic Conversations with Wittfogel’s Ghost: An Introduction.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37 (7): 1151–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654419873677.
Linton, Jamie, and Jessica Budds. 2013. “The Hydrosocial Cycle: Defining and Mobilizing a Relational-Dialectical Approach to Water.” Geoforum 57: 170–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.008
Loftus, Alex. 2009. “Rethinking Political Ecologies of Water.” Third World Quarterly 30 (5): 953–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590902959198
McFarlane, Colin, and Jonathan Rutherford. 2008. “Political Infrastructures: Governing and Experiencing the Fabric of the City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (2): 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00792.x.
Meehan, Katie. 2014. “Tool-power: Water Infrastructure as Wellsprings of State Power.” Geoforum 57: 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.08.005.
Meehan, Katie, and Kendra Stauss. (Eds.). 2015. Precarious Worlds: Contested Geographies of Social Reproduction. Athens: University of Georgia Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book43550
Mitchell, Timothy. 2002. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-politics, Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520928251
Mosse, David. 2003. The Rule of Water: Statecraft, Ecology and Collective Action in South India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
———.(2008). “Epilogue: The Cultural Politics of Water–A Comparative Perspective’. Journal of Southern African Studies, 34(4): 939-948. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070802456847
_______. 2013. “The Anthropology of International Development.” Annual Review of Anthropology 42: 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155553.
Norton, Jack, and Cindi Katz. 2017. “Social Reproduction.” The International Encyclopedia of Geography, edited by Douglas Richardson, Noel Castree, Michael F Goodchild, Audrey Kobayashi, Weidong Liu, and Richard A Marston, 1–11. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
O’Malley, Lewis Sydney Stuart. 1906. Bihar District Gazetteers: Gaya. Patna: Superintendent Secretariat Press.
Roy Chaudhury, Pranab Chandra. 1957. Bihar District Gazetteers: Gaya. Patna: Superintendent Secretariat Press.
Schouten, Peer, and Jan Bachmann. 2022. “Infrastructural Frontiers: Terrains of Resistance at the Material Edge of the State.” Geoforum 136: 219–224. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.06.002.
Scoones, Ian, Rebecca Smalley, Ruth Hall, and Dzodzi Tsikata. 2019. “Narratives of Scarcity: Framing the Global Land Rush.” Geoforum 101: 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.06.006.
Sultana, Farhana. 2011. “Suffering For Water, Suffering From Water: Emotional Geographies of Resource Access, Control and Conflict.” Geoforum 42 (2): 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.12.002.
———. 2013. “Water, Technology, and Development: Transformations of Development: Techno-natures in Changing Waterscapes.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31 (2): 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1068/d20010.
The LADDER Research Team. 2001. “Methods Manual for Fieldwork.” LADDER Working Paper No. 2, UK Department for International Development.
Thrift, Nigel. 2005. Knowing Capitalism. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446211458
Trawick, Paul. 2001. “The Moral Economy of Water: Equity and Antiquity in the Andean Commons.” American Anthropologist 103 (2): 361–379. https://www.jstor.org/stable/683471.
———. 2002. The Moral Economy of Water: General Principles for Successfully Managing the Commons. Gaia 11 (3): 191–194. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.11.3.8
Truelove, Yaffa. 2019. “Gray Zones: The Everyday Practices and Governance of Water Beyond the Network.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (6): 1758–1774. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1581598.
———. 2020. “Who is the State? Infrastructural Power and Everyday Water Governance in Delhi.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 39 (2): 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654419897922.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Amit Kumar Srivastwa, Asmita Kabra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The author(s) retain copyright on work published by INSEE unless specified otherwise.
Licensing and publishing rights
Author(s) of work published by INSEE are required to transfer non-exclusive publishing right to INSEE of the definitive work in any format, language and medium, for any lawful purpose.
Authors who publish in Ecology, Economy and Society will release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. This license allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given.
For details of the rights that the authors grant users of their work, see the "human-readable summary" of the license, with a link to the full license. (Note that "you" refers to a user, not an author, in the summary.)
The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the published article(s), provided attribution is given to the Ecology, Economy and Society—the INSEE Journal with details of the original publication, as set out in the official citation of the article published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the article on the authors’ or their institution’s websites or in institutional repositories.
In case of re-publishing a previously published work, author may note that earlier publication may have taken place a license different from Creative Commons. In all such cases of re-publishing, we advise the authors to consult the applicable licence at article level.
