And Revisiting the Commons
Keywords:Commons, Narpat S. Jodha
Narpat S. Jodha (1937–2020) passed away at the age of 83 years. He is best remembered for his contribution to research on the commons and livelihoods in semi-arid regions in India. His work has transcended geographical boundaries and has won him worldwide recognition. His passing away provides an occasion to revisit the commons issue for multiple reasons, mainly that the livelihood issues that triggered the study of the commons still remain. Despite all the livelihood benefits that the commons provide, it is widely acknowledged that the commons in India are under threat, which throws open multiple questions: Is it due to the absence of secure property rights among local communities or the result of weak governance mechanisms? We also recognize that research on the commons has moved beyond livelihood issues to gender perspectives, digital commons, urban issues, and health.
Bhatta, L. D., A. Shrestha, N. Neupane, N. S. Jodha, and N. Wu. 2019. “Shifting Dynamics of Nature, Society and Agriculture in the Hindu Kush Himalayas: Perspectives for Future Mountain Development.” Journal of Mountain Science 16 (5): 1133–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-5146-4.
Doss, C., G. Summerfield, and D. Tsikata. 2014. “Land, Gender, and Food Security.” Feminist Economics 20 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2014.895021.
Fia, T.. 2020. “An Alternative to Data Ownership: Managing Access to Non-Personal Data through the Commons.” Global Jurist (published online ahead of print 2020), 20200034. https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2020-0034.
Hardin, G. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162 (3859): 1243–48. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.
Hess, C., and E. Ostrom. 2011. Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Jodha, N. S. 1966. “The Scarcity Oriented Growth Pattern of Arid Agriculture.” Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics XXI (4): 1-10.
———. 1967. “Capital Formation in Arid Agriculture-- A Study of Resource Conservation and Reclamation Measures Applied to Arid Agriculture.” PhD thesis. Jodhpur: University of Jodhpur.
———. 1985. “Population Growth and the Decline of Common Property Resources in Rajasthan, India.” Population and Development Review 11 (2): 247. https://doi.org/10.2307/1973488.
———. 1986. “Common Property Resources and the Rural Poor.” Economic and Political Weekly 21 (26): 1169–81.
———. 1988. “Poverty Debate in India: A Minority View.” Economic and Political Weekly 23 (45/47): 2421–28.
———. 2002. Life on the Edge: Sustaining Agriculture and Community Resources in Fragile Environments. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
———. 2007. “Mountain Commons: Changing Space and Status at Community Levels in the Himalayas.” Journal of Mountain Science 4 (2): 124–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-007-0124-2.
Kates, R. W. 2001. “Environment and Development: Sustainability Science.” Science 292 (5517): 641–42. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059386.
Lyon, D. 2014. “Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, Consequences, Critique.” Big Data & Society 1 (2): 205395171454186. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861.
Mukhopadhyay, P. and R. Ghate. 2020. “Narpat S. Jodha: Forever Restless.” Ecology, Economy and Society–the INSEE Journal 3 (2): 219–222. https://doi.org/10.37773/ees.v3i2.90.
Mundoli, S., B. Manjunatha, and H. Nagendra. 2017. “Commons That Provide: The Importance of Bengaluru’s Wooded Groves for Urban Resilience.” International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development 9 (2): 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2016.1264404.
Nagendra, H., X. Bai, E. S. Brondizio, and S. Lwasa. 2018. “The Urban South and the Predicament of Global Sustainability. ” Nature Sustainability 1 (7): 341–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0101-5.
Nagendra, H. and E. Ostrom. 2014. “Applying the Social-Ecological System Framework to the Diagnosis of Urban Lake Commons in Bangalore, India.” Ecology and Society 19 (2): 67. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06582-190267.
Narain, V., and A. K. Singh. 2017. “Flowing against the Current: The Socio-Technical Mediation of Water (in)Security in Periurban Gurgaon, India.” Geoforum 81 (May): 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.02.010.
Nonini, D. M., ed. 2007. The Global Idea of ‘the Commons’. New York: Berghahn Books.
Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2009. “A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems.” Science 325 (5939): 419–22. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133.
Parikh, A. 2020. “Urban Commons to Private Property: Gendered Environments in Mumbai’s Fisher Communities.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space (October). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775820961401.
Parthasarathy, D. 2011. “Hunters, Gatherers and Foragers in a Metropolis: Commonising the Private and Public in Mumbai.” Economic and Political Weekly 46 (50): 54–63.
Prainsack, B. 2019. “Logged out: Ownership, Exclusion and Public Value in the Digital Data and Information Commons.” Big Data & Society 6 (1): 205395171982977. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719829773.
Purtova, N. 2017. “Health Data for Common Good: Defining the Boundaries and Social Dilemmas of Data Commons.” In Under Observation: The Interplay Between EHealth and Surveillance, edited by Samantha Adams, Nadezhda Purtova, and Ronald Leenes, 177–210. Law, Governance and Technology Series. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48342-9_10.
Rao, M. 2020. “Gender and the Urban Commons in India: An Overview of Scientific Literature and the Relevance of a Feminist Political Ecology Perspective.” International Quarterly for Asian Studies 51 (1–2): 261–276. https://doi.org/10.11588/IQAS.2020.1-2.11028.
Rao, S. 2018. “Gender and Class Relations in Rural India. ” The Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (5–6): 950–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2018.1499094.
Sen, A., and Harini Nagendra. 2020. “Local Community Engagement, Environmental Placemaking and Stewardship by Migrants: A Case Study of Lake Conservation in Bengaluru, India. ” Landscape and Urban Planning 204 (December): 103933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103933.
Smith-Nonini, S. (2006). “Conceiving the Health Commons: Operationalizing a “Right” to Health”. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice 50 (3): 233–245. https://doi.org/10.3167/015597706780459331.
Thapliyal, S., A. Mukherji, and Deepak Malghan. 2019. “Economic Inequality and Loss of Commons: Evidence from India. ” World Development 122 (October): 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.012.
Tyagi, N. and S. Das. 2018. “Assessing Gender Responsiveness of Forest Policies in India. ” Forest Policy and Economics 92 (July): 160–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.05.004.
Vij, S. and V. Narain. 2016. “Land, Water & Power: The Demise of Common Property Resources in Periurban Gurgaon, India. ” Land Use Policy 50 (January): 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.030.
Zimmer, A., R. Véron, and N. L. Cornea. 2020. “Urban Ponds, Environmental Imaginaries and (Un)Commoning: An Urban Political Ecology of the Pondscape in a Small City in Gujarat, India.” Water Alternatives 13 (2): 225–47. http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol13/v13issue2/572-a13-2-2/file.
Copyright (c) 2021 Harini Nagendra, Pranab Mukhopadhyay, Rucha Ghate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The author(s) retain copyright on work published by INSEE unless specified otherwise.
Licensing and publishing rights
Author(s) of work published by INSEE are required to transfer non-exclusive publishing right to INSEE of the definitive work in any format, language and medium, for any lawful purpose.
Authors who publish in Ecology, Economy and Society will release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. This license allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given.
For details of the rights that the authors grant users of their work, see the "human-readable summary" of the license, with a link to the full license. (Note that "you" refers to a user, not an author, in the summary.)
The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the published article(s), provided attribution is given to the Ecology, Economy and Society—the INSEE Journal with details of the original publication, as set out in the official citation of the article published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the article on the authors’ or their institution’s websites or in institutional repositories.
In case of re-publishing a previously published work, author may note that earlier publication may have taken place a license different from Creative Commons. In all such cases of re-publishing, we advise the authors to consult the applicable licence at article level.