Combining Political Ecology and ‘Mésologie’ for a New Geography of Rivers?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37773/ees.v3i2.231Keywords:
river, Anthropocene, political ecology, mésologie, hydrosocial cycleAbstract
How do we rethink the integrated management of river basins? This article is mainly a theoretical contribution that aims to reflect on ways of knowing rivers in the context of the Anthropocene. The authors suggest a new framework based on post-positivist geographies for a deeper understanding of environmental, political, and social conflicts related to rivers. They highlight the potential of combining political ecology and its hydrosocial cycle framework with the mésologie of Augustin Berque. This approach, inspired by non-modern ontologies, helps to account for the full texture of the relationship between society and rivers. It emphasizes human–environment relations and the concept of “milieu”. It particularly captures the role of lived experience in river–human relationships, by accounting for the emotions and interpretations that link people to rivers both collectively and individually. This is particularly appropriate in the Indian context where rivers are ritually revered.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Alatout, Samer. 2012. “Hydro-imaginaries and the Political Geography of the Jordan River.” In Environmental Imaginaries of the Middle East and North Africa, edited by Diana K. Davis and Edmond Burke, 218–45. Athens: Ohio University Press.
Bakker, Karen. 1999. “The Politics of Hydropower: Developing the Mekong.” Political Geography 18 (2): 209–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(98)00085-7.
_________. 2000. “Privatizing Water, Producing Scarcity: The Yorkshire Drought of 1995.” Economic Geography 76 (1): 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2000.tb00131.x.
Berque, Augustin. 1986. Le Sauvage et l’Artifice: Les Japonais Devant la Nature. Paris: Gallimard.
________. 2014. La Mésologie, Pourquoi et Pour Quoi Faire? Nanterre: Presses Universitaires de Paris Ouest.
________. 2016. Écoumène: Introduction à l’Étude des Milieux Humains. Paris: Belin.
Boelens, Rutgerd. 2014. “Cultural Politics and the Hydrosocial Cycle: Water, Power and Identity in the Andean Highlands.” Geoforum 57: 234–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.02.008.
Bouleau, Gabrielle. 2014. “The Co-Production of Science and Waterscapes: The Case of the Seine and the Rhône Rivers, France.” Geoforum 57: 248–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.01.009.
Bourblanc, Magalie and David Blanchon. 2014. “The Challenges of Rescaling South African Water Resources Management: Catchment Management Agencies and Interbasin Transfers.” Journal of Hydrology 519, part C: 2381–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.001.
Braun, Bruce. 2008. “Nature and Culture: On the Career of a False Problem.” In A Companion to Cultural Geography, edited by J. S. Duncan, N. C. Johnson, and R. H. Schein, 151–79. Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Chartier, Denis and Estienne Rodary. 2016. Manifeste Pour une Géographie Environnementale: Géographie, Écologie, Politique. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.
Dallman, S. M. Ngo, P. Laris, and D. Thien. 2013. “Political Ecology of Emotion and Sacred Space: The Winnemem Wintu Struggles with California Water Policy.” Emotion, Space and Society 6: 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2011.10.006.
Drew, Georgina. 2017. River Dialogues: Hindu Faith and the Political Ecology of Dams on the Sacred Ganga. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
Eck, Diana L. 2012. India: A Sacred Geography. New York: Harmony Books.
Foucault, Michel, François Ewald, Alessandro Fontana, and Frédéric Gros. 2001. L’herméneutique Du Sujet: Cours Au Collège de France, 1981–1982. Paris: Gallimard, Seuil.
Graefe, Olivier. 2011. “River Basins as New Environmental Regions? The Depolitization of Water Management.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 14: 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.014.
Harvey, David. 1996. Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Cambridge Mass: Blackwell.
Latour, Bruno. 1991. Nous N’Avons Jamais Été Modernes: Essai D’Anthropologie Symétrique. Paris: La Découverte.
Lave, Rebecca. 2015. “Introduction to Special Issue on Critical Physical Geography.” Progress in Physical Geography 39 (5): 571–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133315608006.
Linton, Jamie. 2010. What Is Water? The History of a Modern Abstraction. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Linton, Jamie and Jessica Budds. 2014. “The Hydrosocial Cycle: Defining and Mobilizing a Relational-Dialectical Approach to Water.” Geoforum 57: 170–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.008.
Metchnikoff, Leon. 1889. La Civilisation et les Grands Fleuves Historiques. Paris: Hachette.
Matthews, Nathanial. 2012. “Water Grabbing in the Mekong Basin – An Analysis of the Winners and Losers of Thailand’s Hydropower Development in Lao PDR.” Water Alternatives 5(2): 392–411. http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/all-abs/176-a5-2-12/file. Accessed on April 13, 2020.
Mick, Smith. 2013. “Earthly Passion(s): Essays towards an Emotional Ecology.” Emotion Space and Society 6: 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2012.12.002.
Moberg, Mark. 2013. Engaging Anthropological Theory: A Social and Political History. London; New York: Routledge.
Molle, François. 2005. “Elements for a Political Ecology of River Basins Development: The Case of the Chao Phraya River Basin, Thailand.” In the Fourth Conference of the International Water History Association, Paris, International Water Management Institute.
Molle, François, Peter Mollinga and Philippus Wester. 2009. “Hydraulic Bureaucracies and the Hydraulic Mission: Flows of Water, Flows of Power.” Water Alternatives 2 (3): 328–349. http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/allabs/65-a2-3-3/file. Accessed on April 2, 2020.
Mukherjee, Jenia and Anuradha Choudry. 2018. “Beyond Anthropocentricism: Perceiving South Asian Environmentalism from Sanskrit Literature and Tradition.” In Glimpses of Environmental History, edited by Mahua Sarkar and Subhasis Biswas, 127–141. Kolkata: Jadavpur University.
NIH National Institute of Hydrology. 2018. “Hydrologic Knowledge in Ancient India.” 2nd edition. http://nihroorkee.gov.in/publication/hydrologic-knowledge-ancient-india. Accessed on April 12, 2020.
Norman, Emma S. and Karen Bakker. 2009. “Transgressing Scales: Water Governance across the Canada–U.S. Borderland.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 99 (1): 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600802317218.
Pascual, Unai, Patricia Balvanera, Sandra Díaz, György Pataki, Eva Roth, Marie Stenseke, Robert T Watson, et al. 2017. “Valuing Nature’s Contributions to People: The IPBES Approach.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26–27 (June): 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006.
Pardé, Maurice. 1959. “Les Moyens et L’Esprit de la Potamologie.” Revue Canadienne de Géographie XIII (2): 3–4.
Pelletier, Philippe. 2013. Géographie et Anarchie. Reclus, Kropotkine, Metchnikoff. Chaucre: Éd. du Monde Libertaire & Éd. Libertaires.
Peterson, Garry. 2000. “Political Ecology and Ecological Resilience: An Integration of Human and Ecological Dynamics.” Ecological Economics 35 (3): 323–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00217-2.
Pradeau, Jean-François. 2013. “Phénoménologie.” In Dictionnaire de la Géographie et de l’Espace des Sociétés, edited by Jacques Lévy et Michel Lussault. Paris: Belin.
Rangan, Haripriya and Christian Kull. 2009. “What Makes Ecology ‘Political’?: Rethinking ‘Scale’ in Political Ecology.” Progress in Human Geography 33 (1): 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508090215.
Rérat, Patrick (edited). 2011. La ‘Pensée Du Monde’ : Une Société de Géographie à La Belle Epoque. Neuchâtel: Ed. Alphil-Presses Universitaires Suisses.
Sharma, Mukul. 2009. “Passages from Nature to Nationalism: Sunderlal Bahuguna and Tehri Dam Opposition in Garhwal.” Economic and Political Weekly 44 (8): 35–42. www.jstor.org/stable/40278527. Accessed on April 14, 2020.
Singh, Rana P. B. 2013. “The Gangā River: Images, Sacrality and Salvific Places.” In Hindu Tradition of Pilgrimage: Sacred Space and System, edited by Rana P. B. Singh and Robert H. Stoddard, 159–94. New Delhi: Dev Publishers & Distributors.
Sneddon, Chris and Coleen Fox. 2006. “Rethinking Transboundary Waters: A Critical Hydropolitics of the Mekong Basin.” Political Geography 25 (2): 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.11.002.
Sultana, Farhana. 2015. “Emotional Political Ecology.” In The International Handbook of Political Ecology, edited by R. Bryant, 633–45. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Swyngedouw, Erik. 1999. “Modernity and Hybridity: Nature, Regeneracionismo, and the Production of the Spanish Waterscape, 1890–1930.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89 (3): 443–65.
Swyngedouw, Erik. 2007. “Technonatural Revolutions: The Scalar Politics of Franco’s Hydro-Social Dream for Spain, 1939–1975.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32 (1): 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00233.x.
Swyngedouw, Erik, Maria Kaika and Jose Esteban Castro. 2002. “Urban Water: A Political Ecology Perspective.” Built Environment 28 (2): 124–37. www.jstor.org/stable/23288796. Accessed on April 14, 2020.
Swyngedouw, Erik and Nik C. Heynen. 2003. “Urban Political Ecology, Justice and the Politics of Scale” Antipode 35, no. 5: 898–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2003.00364.x.
Tvedt, Terje. 2011. “Hydrology and Empire: The Nile, Water Imperialism and the Partition of Africa.” The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 39 (2): 173–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/03086534.2011.568759.
Vogel, Eve. 2012. “Parcelling out the Watershed: The Recurring Consequences of Organising Columbia River Management within a Basin-Based Territory.” Water Alternatives 5 (1): 161–90. http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/all-abs/163-a5-1-10/file. Accessed on April 20, 2020.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The author(s) retain copyright on work published by INSEE unless specified otherwise.
Licensing and publishing rights
Author(s) of work published by INSEE are required to transfer non-exclusive publishing right to INSEE of the definitive work in any format, language and medium, for any lawful purpose.
Authors who publish in Ecology, Economy and Society will release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. This license allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given.
For details of the rights that the authors grant users of their work, see the "human-readable summary" of the license, with a link to the full license. (Note that "you" refers to a user, not an author, in the summary.)
The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the published article(s), provided attribution is given to the Ecology, Economy and Society—the INSEE Journal with details of the original publication, as set out in the official citation of the article published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the article on the authors’ or their institution’s websites or in institutional repositories.
In case of re-publishing a previously published work, author may note that earlier publication may have taken place a license different from Creative Commons. In all such cases of re-publishing, we advise the authors to consult the applicable licence at article level.
