Political Ecology of Urban Agricultural Pollution
Cultivating the Yamuna Floodplains in Delhi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37773/ees.v6i2.1052Keywords:
Toxicity, Commercial agriculture, Floodplain, Uncertainty, Lay epidemiology, Urban ecologiesAbstract
The Yamuna khadar or the floodplains of the river Yamuna in Delhi is a deeply contested agrarian space. While thousands have been involved in farming these floodplains for decades, contestations over their legality, compensation, land use, displacement, and impact on the river, soil, and city have been significant public concerns over the last few decades. In this paper, I focus on one aspect of this agrarian landscape—the toxicity associated with river water due to the pesticides and fertilizers used in agriculture. I examine how toxicity is perceived, discursively constructed, and dealt with by differently located stakeholders in this landscape. The differently located stakeholders associated with the toxic agrarian landscape of Yamuna khadar are not experiencing pollution as a homogenous community, i.e., neither all of them see themselves as suffering from pollution nor do they see themselves as contributing to the toxicity of the landscape in a similar way.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Auyero, Javier, and Débora Alejandra Swistun. 2009. Flammable: Environmental Suffering in an Argentine Shantytown. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baviskar, Amita. 2011. “What the Eye Does Not See: The Yamuna in the Imagination of Delhi.” Economic & Political Weekly XLVI, no. 50: 45–53.
Brown, Phil, and Edwin Mikkelsen. 1990. No Safe Place: Toxic Waste, Leukemia, and Community Action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cable, Sherry, and Edward Walsh. 1991. “The Emergence of Environmental Protest: Yellow Creek and TMI Compared.” In Communities at Risk: Collective Responses to Technological Hazards, edited by Stephen Robert Couch and J. Stephen Kroll-Smith, 113–32. New York: Peter Lang.
Ghertner, D. A. 2015. Rule by Aesthetics: World-class City Making in Delhi. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199385560.001.0001
Gururani, Shubhra. 2018. “When Land Becomes Gold: Changing Political Ecology of the Commons in a Rural–Urban Frontier.” In Land Rights, Biodiversity Conservation and Justice: Rethinking Parks and People, edited by Sharlene Mollett and Thembela Kepe, 107–125. London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315439488-7
Levine, Adeline Gordon. 1982. Love Canal: Science, Politics, and People. Toronto: Lexington Books.
Lora-Wainwright, Anna. 2013a. “Plural Forms of Evidence and Uncertainty in Environmental Health: A Comparison of Two Chinese Cases.” Evidence and Policy 9, no. 1: 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426413X662554.
Lora-Wainwright, Anna. 2013b. “The Inadequate Life: Rural Industrial Pollution and Lay Epidemiology in China.” The China Quarterly 214: 302–320.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741013000349
Nagendra, Harini. 2016. Nature in the City: Bengaluru in the Past, Present and Future. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Oskarsson, Patrik, Kuntala Lahiri‐Dutt, and Patrick Wennström. 2019. “From Incremental Dispossession to a Cumulative Land Grab: Understanding Territorial Transformation in India’s North Karanpura Coalfield.” Development and Change 50, no. 6, 1485–1508.
https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12513
Rademacher, Anne. 2011. Reigning the River: Urban Ecologies and Political Transformation in Kathmandu. New York: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394525
UIDAI. n.d. “Home.” Accessed July 17, 2023. https://www.uidai.gov.in/en/16-english-uk/aapka-aadhaar/14-what-is-aadhaar.html#:~:text=Aadhaar%20is%20a%2012%20digit%20individual%20identification%20number%20issued%20by,and%20address%2C%20anywhere%20in%20India.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rajat Kumar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The author(s) retain copyright on work published by INSEE unless specified otherwise.
Licensing and publishing rights
Author(s) of work published by INSEE are required to transfer non-exclusive publishing right to INSEE of the definitive work in any format, language and medium, for any lawful purpose.
Authors who publish in Ecology, Economy and Society will release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. This license allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given.
For details of the rights that the authors grant users of their work, see the "human-readable summary" of the license, with a link to the full license. (Note that "you" refers to a user, not an author, in the summary.)
The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the published article(s), provided attribution is given to the Ecology, Economy and Society—the INSEE Journal with details of the original publication, as set out in the official citation of the article published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the article on the authors’ or their institution’s websites or in institutional repositories.
In case of re-publishing a previously published work, author may note that earlier publication may have taken place a license different from Creative Commons. In all such cases of re-publishing, we advise the authors to consult the applicable licence at article level.
