Political Ecology of Urban Agricultural Pollution: Cultivating the Yamuna Floodplains in Delhi

Rajat Kumar

doi:10.37773/ees.v6i2.1052

Authors

Rajat Kumar Department of Sociology, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, India https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5825-8490

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37773/ees.v6i2.1052

Keywords:

Toxicity, Commercial agriculture, Floodplain, Uncertainty, Lay epidemiology, Urban ecologies

Abstract

The Yamuna khadar or the floodplains of the river Yamuna in Delhi is a deeply contested agrarian space. While thousands have been involved in farming these floodplains for decades, contestations over their legality, compensation, land use, displacement, and impact on the river, soil, and city have been significant public concerns over the last few decades. In this paper, I focus on one aspect of this agrarian landscape—the toxicity associated with river water due to the pesticides and fertilizers used in agriculture. I examine how toxicity is perceived, discursively constructed, and dealt with by differently located stakeholders in this landscape. The differently located stakeholders associated with the toxic agrarian landscape of Yamuna khadar are not experiencing pollution as a homogenous community, i.e., neither all of them see themselves as suffering from pollution nor do they see themselves as contributing to the toxicity of the landscape in a similar way.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Auyero, Javier, and Débora Alejandra Swistun. 2009. Flammable: Environmental Suffering in an Argentine Shantytown. New York: Oxford University Press.

Baviskar, Amita. 2011. “What the Eye Does Not See: The Yamuna in the Imagination of Delhi.” Economic & Political Weekly XLVI, no. 50: 45–53.

Brown, Phil, and Edwin Mikkelsen. 1990. No Safe Place: Toxic Waste, Leukemia, and Community Action. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Cable, Sherry, and Edward Walsh. 1991. “The Emergence of Environmental Protest: Yellow Creek and TMI Compared.” In Communities at Risk: Collective Responses to Technological Hazards, edited by Stephen Robert Couch and J. Stephen Kroll-Smith, 113–32. New York: Peter Lang.

Ghertner, D. A. 2015. Rule by Aesthetics: World-class City Making in Delhi. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199385560.001.0001

Gururani, Shubhra. 2018. “When Land Becomes Gold: Changing Political Ecology of the Commons in a Rural–Urban Frontier.” In Land Rights, Biodiversity Conservation and Justice: Rethinking Parks and People, edited by Sharlene Mollett and Thembela Kepe, 107–125. London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315439488-7

Levine, Adeline Gordon. 1982. Love Canal: Science, Politics, and People. Toronto: Lexington Books.

Lora-Wainwright, Anna. 2013a. “Plural Forms of Evidence and Uncertainty in Environmental Health: A Comparison of Two Chinese Cases.” Evidence and Policy 9, no. 1: 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426413X662554.

Lora-Wainwright, Anna. 2013b. “The Inadequate Life: Rural Industrial Pollution and Lay Epidemiology in China.” The China Quarterly 214: 302–320.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741013000349

Nagendra, Harini. 2016. Nature in the City: Bengaluru in the Past, Present and Future. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Oskarsson, Patrik, Kuntala Lahiri‐Dutt, and Patrick Wennström. 2019. “From Incremental Dispossession to a Cumulative Land Grab: Understanding Territorial Transformation in India’s North Karanpura Coalfield.” Development and Change 50, no. 6, 1485–1508.

https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12513

Rademacher, Anne. 2011. Reigning the River: Urban Ecologies and Political Transformation in Kathmandu. New York: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394525

UIDAI. n.d. “Home.” Accessed July 17, 2023. https://www.uidai.gov.in/en/16-english-uk/aapka-aadhaar/14-what-is-aadhaar.html#:~:text=Aadhaar%20is%20a%2012%20digit%20individual%20identification%20number%20issued%20by,and%20address%2C%20anywhere%20in%20India.