On Natural Capital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37773/ees.v9i1.1899Keywords:
Natural Capital, Impact Inequality, Economics of BiodiversityAbstract
This paper provides a brief on the economics of biodiversity. The human economy is seen here as being embedded in the biosphere, which is an all-embracing planetary capital asset. Ecosystems are components of the biosphere; hence, they are considered forms of ‘natural capital’. The economics of biodiversity thus constitutes the study of a specific class of asset management problems. Theoretical reasoning and empirical findings tell us that human activities have given rise to ecological overreach, breaching the safe operating space of our planetary boundaries. In effect, we have been overdrawing the global stock of natural capital. The underlying reason for the increasing overdraft is the under-pricing of natural capital. The implications of this for our economic prospects are the subject of this paper.
Downloads
References
Brundtland Commission. 1987. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press.
Dasgupta, Partha, and Karl-Göran Mäler. 2000. “Net National Product, Wealth, and Social Well-Being.” Environment and Development Economics 5 (1): 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X00000061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X00000061
Dasgupta, Partha, Stephen A Marglin, and Amartya Sen. 1972. Guidelines for Project Evaluation in Developing Countries. United Nations. https://downloads.unido.org/ot/46/88/4688269/double%20-%20Guidelines%20for%20Project%20Evaluation.pdf.
Dasgupta, Partha, T C A Anant, K Basu, K Chopra, N Desai, H Gundimeda, V Kelkar, R Kolli, K Parikh, P Sen, P Shyamsundar, E Somanathan, and K Sundaram. 2013. Green National Accounts in India: A Framework. Report by an Expert Group convened by the National Statistical Organisation, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India. https://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/Green_National_Accouts_in_India_1may13.pdf
Dasgupta, Partha. 2021. The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review. Her Majesty’s Treasury. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/final-report-the-economics-of-biodiversity-the-dasgupta-review.
Dasgupta, Partha. 2024. The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009494359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009494359
Dasgupta, Partha. 2025. On Natural Capital: The Value of the World Around Us. Witness, Penguin.
Dasgupta, Partha. 2026. On Natural Capital: The Value of the World Around Us. HarperCollins.
Ehrlich, Paul R, and John P Holdren. 1971. “Impact of Population Growth.” Science 171 (3977): 1212–17. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3977.1212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3977.1212
Mäler, Karl-Göran. 1974. Environmental Economics: A Theoretical Inquiry. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Markandya, A, and M N Murty. 2004. “Cost–Benefit Analysis of Cleaning the Ganges: Some Emerging Environment and Development Issues.” Environment and Development Economics 9 (1): 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X03001013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X03001013
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island Press.
Ramsey, F P. 1928. “A Mathematical Theory of Saving.” Economic Journal 38 (152): 543–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2224098
Rockström, Johan, Will Steffen, Kevin Noone, Åsa Persson, F. Stuart III Chapin, Eric Lambin, Timothy M. Lenton, Marten Scheffer, Carl Folke, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Björn Nykvist, Cynthia A. de Wit, Terry Huges, Sander van der Leeuw, Henning Rodhe, Sverker Sörlin, Peter K. Snyder, Robert Costanza, Uno Svedin, Malin Falkenmark, Louise Karlberg, Robert W. Correll, Victoria J. Fabry, James Hansen, Brian Walker, Diana Liverman, Katherine Richardson, Paul Crutzen, and Jonathan Foley. 2009. “Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity”. Ecology and Society 14 (2): 32. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232
Steffen, Will, Katherine Richardson, Johan Rockström,Sarah E. Cornell, Ingo Fetzer, Elena M. Bennett, Reinette Biggs, Stephen R. Carpenter, Wim De Vries, Cynthia A. de Wit, Carl Folke, Dieter Garten, Jens Heinke, Georgina M. Mace, Linn M. Persson, Veerabhadran Ramanathan, Belinda Reyers, and Sverker Sörlin. 2015. “Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet”. Science 347 (6223): 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
Wackernagel, Mathis, and Bert Beyers. 2019. Ecological Footprint: Managing our Biocapacity Budget. New Society Publishers.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Partha Dasgupta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The author(s) retain copyright on work published by INSEE unless specified otherwise.
Licensing and publishing rights
Author(s) of work published by INSEE are required to transfer non-exclusive publishing right to INSEE of the definitive work in any format, language and medium, for any lawful purpose.
Authors who publish in Ecology, Economy and Society will release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. This license allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given.
For details of the rights that the authors grant users of their work, see the "human-readable summary" of the license, with a link to the full license. (Note that "you" refers to a user, not an author, in the summary.)
The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the published article(s), provided attribution is given to the Ecology, Economy and Society—the INSEE Journal with details of the original publication, as set out in the official citation of the article published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the article on the authors’ or their institution’s websites or in institutional repositories.
In case of re-publishing a previously published work, author may note that earlier publication may have taken place a license different from Creative Commons. In all such cases of re-publishing, we advise the authors to consult the applicable licence at article level.
Ecology, Ecoomy and Society--the INSEE Journal is a society run diamond Open Access and Scopus indexed journal.